WebFrontiero v. Richardson Supreme Court of the United States, 1973 411 U.S. 677. Listen to the opinion: Tweet Brief Fact Summary. A married woman Air Force officer sought increased benefits for her husband as a "dependent." When her application was denied for failure to satisfy the statutory dependency standard, her and her husband brought this ... WebFrontiero v. Richardson United States Supreme Court 411 U.S. 677 (1973) A married woman in the Air Force, Lt. Frontiero sought to increase her benefits for her husband as a "dependent" under 37 U.S.C. §§ 401, 403, and 10 U.S.C. §§ 1072, 1076. Servicemen have no trouble claiming their wives as dependents. They can get benefits for them …
Soule v. CT Association of Schools - Amicus Brief (filing)
WebDec 7, 2024 · Frontiero v. Richardson (Argued Jan. 17, 1973; Decided May 14, 1973) Ginsburg appeared for American Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae, by special leave of Court. Sharron Frontiero, a lieutenant in the United States Air Force, sought a dependent's allowance for her husband. WebMay 14, 2024 · On May 14, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Frontiero v. Richardson, a case that furthered the cause of gender equality within the U.S. military and, indeed, the United States. robinstown ireland
Frontiero v. Richardson :: 411 U.S. 677 (1973) :: Justia US …
WebThe Appellant, Sharron Frontiero (Appellant), asserts that a military practice that automatically allowed the wives of male officers to be considered as dependents and … WebWhat was the significance of the Equal Rights Amendment to the case Frontiero v. Richardson? The amendment was ratified and this ruling needed to comport with the new amendment. It had no... WebFrontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973) Heightened scrutiny applies to disparate treatment based on gender, so a law is unconstitutional if it gives benefits to the spouses … robinstown soccer club